Forum Topic
CompsognathusMember2 XPApr-05-2013 9:34 AMHere is my review for Jurassic Park 3D. I loved the original but honestly, unless your a die hard there is no reason to go. The film was never intended for, nor shot or lit for 3D so as such, the conversion offers anything that is really that great. It is great seeing the film on an IMAX screen but if you have a big screen at the house and the Blu-ray then you are getting an experience that is just as good if not better.
[url]http://sknr.net/2013/04/05/jurassic-park-3d/[/url]
3 Responses to Jurassic Park 3D Review
CompsognathusMember0 XPApr-06-2013 6:52 PMmany parts of the first jp were great in 3d you not giving it enough credit, to start off with comparing the two (original and 3d versions) this looks much better they didn't have a lot too work with in 3d the images look to be more realistic they have more tone and definition too them so they dont look like there right on the screen
for parts of it I felt like i was really there everything had more color too it it seemed more real...
of course every ones entitled to an opinion, i respect that but your not giving the old film the credit it deserves, and if you didn't like the original in 3d how do you think you'll like the fourth???
im just saying that you need to give it credit, it never was intended to be in 3-d, ill give you that, all they did too it was edited it too make it more in-def., more real ,more textured... catching my drift?
so before you begin complaining just think what did they have to work with? how better did it look compared to the original???
also this isn't from my die hard point of view this is from my critic point of view
i do respect your points of view, your entitled too your own opinion, just dont go saying how terrible it was with out thinking of the other parts of it... Life cannot be contained, it breaks walls, crashes through barriers sometimes painfully, but uh... Life uh, finds a way
CompsognathusMember0 XPAug-02-2013 8:48 PMI agree with "Gareth". i was not impressed. it looked more like a test for "3-D" with many problems. this is a great film that did not need the "3-D" treatmentAdd A Reply
Log in to Post
